Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Hero

Zhang Yimou's film "Hero" stars Jet Li playing the protagonist Nameless. Nameless has set to kill the Kingdom of China's three greatest threats: Broken Sword, Flying Snow and Long Sky. The three have vowed to assassinate the King of Qin. The main plot of the film takes place within the royal palace while Nameless has a conversation with the King. Through flashbacks , Nameless tells his of journey where he single handedly defeated all three of the great assassins in order to save his beloved country.

"Hero", known in China as "Ying Xiong" was the most expensive Chinese film when released in late 2002. This vast budget can be see in the stunning visual effects throughout the film. Each dramatic fight scene is beautifully designed and appears more of work of art than Hollywood action scene. Bright, bold colors are employed throughout the entire film. They are used to stress certain objects during the flashbacks. The vibrant colors are further used to distinguish the one characters perspective from another.

Unity is one of the main underlying themes throughout this film. Nameless has sacrificed his life in order to unify his nation. This idea can be apply to modern day China, as well as all other nations. In order to succeed, a nation must be unified and work together to find prosperity.

Amores Perros

Amores Perros is a drama of three storylines all interconnected in some way, shape or form to dogs. The first story is of Octavio and Susana who are brother and sister-in-law, yet begin to form a relationship which later becomes complicated due to dogfighting. The second story is of Daniel and Valeria. Daniel works for a magazine and has a happy family, but leaves them to live with Valeria, who is a model. The third storyline is of El Chivo, a dirty homeless man who consistently appears throughout the film in various circumstances.

The film, with these three storylines, almost seems like three different films. Each of the separate stories has their own aspects of misc-en-scene and camerawork. For example: Octavio's storyline from the opening of the film shows a frantic pace, very similar to his passionate and impulsive behavior. On the other hand, the scenes with Daniel and Valeria are much more subdued and slow-paced, similar to their lifestyle.  When the stories do intertwine though, these differences become blurred and the film styles mesh together creating a mixture that feels natural. Yet when the characters' stories then separate again they return to their original states.

This film says a lot for both globalization in Mexico and the lack of it as well through the different stories. Octavio brings a very local flavor to the mix, with a lower class family and dogfighting lifestyle. Valeria and Daniel bring a very globablized appeal, due to her supermodel status and their understanding of things in the outside world. When these two worlds collide conflict ensues though. El Chivo has a grasp on globalization that few know about. This, in fact, makes him a very complex character, keeping the viewer guessing at his real intentions for the majority of the film.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Amélie

Based in Paris, we are introduced to the odd yet lovable Amélie Poulain through a gruesome birth scene. However, despite this starkly realistic start, the film evolves, through Jeunet’s wizardry with the camera, to a whimsical and heart-warming romance comedy. Even in her youth, Amélie has a strange fascination with all things out of the ordinary, and this fascination lives on as she grows up under her anti-social father. However, Amélie’s story doesn’t really begin until she uncovers an old box of childhood keepsakes hidden in her apartment. This catapults her into a frantic search for the unsuspecting owner. Loving the sense of accomplishment and unacknowledged praise and adoration felt from returning the gift, Amélie sets off to perform more philanthropic deeds. It is on this adventure that the charming Amélie falls in love, but she must learn to love herself before she can love anyone else.

Jean-Pierre Jeunet’s quirky filming techniques shine through in this oddball modern-day fairytale. “Amélie” is reminiscent of Jeunet’s other works “Delicatessen” and “The City of Lost Children” but not nearly as dark as these two previous films. Similar to “Delicatessen”, the viewer is introduced to a variety of peculiar characters upon which the story builds. Throughout the entirety of the film, the fragmented stories are played out in this nonlinear work. Jeunet employs saturated colors to highlight the cast of eccentric characters and sepia tones help to emerge the viewer in the dreamy and fanciful world of “Amélie”. This refreshing film breaks the mold of the typical romance comedy and is definitely worth the watch.

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Swades Film


Ashutosh Gowariker makes a slight departure from the normal glitz of traditional Bollywood films in his 2004 film "Swades: We the People". The film explores the universal themes of national identity, globalization versus tradition, and the social constructs of family by documenting the “quarter-life crisis” of Mohan Bhargav.

While lasting 195 minutes, this film struggles to adequately delve into the many topics the director introduces. The viewer is consistently introduced to a theme such as the caste system, implementation of technology, feminism, and family life. Once the theme has been introduced, the director uses the characters to present both sides of the issue. After the audience has been shown the opposing sides of the issue at hand, the director tends to gloss over the topic without providing a concrete resolution causing the audience to consider the issue for themselves. This can be seen in many parts of the film including the feminist proclamation of Gita, the declaration of Mohan that Harabis should not be compelled to pay rent, and the ending scene of the film where we see that Mohan has forsaken his American identity to return to the village.

Ignoring the director’s inability to express a concrete opinion on issues challenging modern day India, the viewer will likely notice the film’s strong use of symbolism. The recurring theme of water helps to illustrate Mohan’s dual national identity and ultimately is used to represent his surrender to his Indian heritage. Likewise the film makes an excellent use of color to illustrate both the different nations and the different castes within the society of the village.

"Swades: We the People" presents an interesting commentary on the true-to-life conflicts facing modern India. However, when these conflicts are truly being explored, the director retreats to the sugar coated film techniques of traditional Bollywood and stops short of presenting answers to the most integral topics of discussion in the film. These shortcomings prevent the movie from becoming a serious commentary on the social struggles of Indians.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Sample Clips

Here is a compilation of a few shots taken by our group that exemplify some of the techniques and qualities commonly used in the creation of major motion pictures.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Varying National Stereotypes

College-aged men experiencing foreign European cultures is the focus of the films Eurotrip and L’ Auberge Esapagnole. The French produced film of Cedric Klapisch, L’ Auberge Esapagnole (The Spanish Apartment), centers on a young economics student named Xavier. He has left his home country of France in order to gain a working knowledge of the Spanish language and to escape from his overprotective parents. In pursuit of this goal, he spends a year in Barcelona, Spain where he lives with six other students from all over the world. In comparison, the American made film, Eurotrip, focuses on a young college student named Scott who has the unfortunate misfortune of having just lost his long time girlfriend. He has left for Europe with three of his close friends with hopes of escaping problems back home as well as gaining new life experiences. Much like the French student Xavier, Scott meets new people of all different nationalities throughout his travels. When each protagonist meets a new character from a foreign country, they encounter the various stereotypes, both positive and negative, that are so prevalent in today’s society. However, each director chooses to portray these cross-cultural experiences in different, yet amusing ways.

Two stereotypes within the films are portrayed through British characters. During Scott’s trip across Europe, he runs into a British soccer gang portrayed as loud, slightly obnoxious men who are constantly drinking beer; everything one would want from a band of soccer fans. Over time Scott realizes that the men are much more than just drunken hooligans, and in fact he becomes good friends with most of them. In L’ Auberge Esapagnole, Xavier also meets a British character. Her name is Wendy and at first glance she is a very kind and sweet girl. Similar to the soccer fans, Wendy is not afraid to raise her voice in order to her point across. Several times throughout the film she can be seen yelling at the boys to clean up their messes all around the apartment, while receiving numerous sarcastic comments in return. She is an example of the stereotypical overly-zealous, overly-dramatacized woman. Yet throughout the film her character is explained more fully, and the stereotype is again overcome.


Wendy's brother, William, offers several more examples of stereotyping in society. When he first arrives at the apartment he comes off as an ignorant foreigner. Within the first scene, William goes on a rant making gross generalizations about Spanish people. Isabelle, the Spanish woman in the house, takes great offense to these comments and calls William out for believing in stereotypes and how he is incorrect. Ironically, William later calls Isabelle out several times for actually following the stereotype of being overly proud. After staying in the house for a few days, William continues making gross generalizations by comparing the German in the house to Adolf Hitler because he is very organized, and he forms opinions about peoples’ character based on a few questions. Initially, the German takes great offense to William’s comments even though the characteristics do apply to him, as can be seen throughout the film.

In Eurotrip, Mika’s dad also exhibits similar characteristics to the German: upright, organized and formal. The director further plays off this stereotype by having the younger boy dress similarly to Hitler, and having him march in typical WWII German fashion. While the American film tends to take a more comedic approach when looking at the various European stereotypes, the French film takes a more serious tone. While the stereotypes may loosely apply in some senses overall they are seen as rude and uneducated comments that offend the recipient.

The stereotypes within these films are not limited solely to the European characters. The films also make sweeping statements about American culture. In Cedric Klapisch’s film, he includes one American who becomes Wendy’s other love interest beyond her current boyfriend. He is displayed as an ignorant, wild character with no intelligence, who only cares about sex, and has virtually no dialogue during the film beyond pounding on his chest and screaming. Eurotrip portrays similar ideals when Scott’s friend Cooper frequently talks about how his one goal during the trip is to find as many beautiful women as he can. He does not care about the breath taking sights or the amazing people they meet along the way. Cooper focuses solely on his goal and seems to have little care for anyone else. However, instead of maintaining his ignorant stereotype, like the American in L’ Auberge Esapagnole, Cooper learns that friends are more important than anything, and only they can make you truly happy. It is important to note that the American film depicts some of the American characters as a bit obnoxious and yet over time they evolve and become more mature. This is the exact opposite depiction of European film where the American character never learns from his mistakes, and is basically run out of the house. It would seem that people tend to have a more positive opinion of their own culture when compared to an outside source. This can be seen in the portrayal of stereotypes, more specifically within the negative and positive connotations that can be derived from them.

The films also portray another aspect of cross-cultural experiences in that they express several examples of globalization throughout their plots. One of the most obvious examples of this can be seen through the use of language in both films. Within the apartment of L’ Auberge Esapagnole four different languages are spoken: English, French, Spanish, and German. With time the roommates are able to overcome the language barriers they face, and in doing so they are brought even closer together. In Eurotrip, Scott and Mika must also overcome a language barrier; he doesn’t know German and she does not know English. To solve this, Scott goes as far as learning German solely so he can communicate with her.

The globalization of the music industry and cultural tastes can also be seen in Eurotrip. During Scott’s travels, he ends up in a German nightclub where he hears a song in English that was just recently popular in the states. Although this may have been placed for comedic value it demonstrates the fact that all cultures are becominging more inter-connected.

In a world that is growing ever smaller, people are forced to connect in different ways. Stereotypes are used in numerous situations to portray a commonality in cross-cultural viewpoints, and their effect on people is diverse. These two films, L’ Auberge Esapagnole and Eurotrip, focus nationalistic stereotypes to develop their plots as well as add comic relief. The two films come from drastically different cultures so it can be expected that they will view certain stereotypes in different manners, and yet it is interesting that often times the stereotypes themselves are the same. These generalizations can be attributed to globalization trends in our world, and can teach us about how various cultures perceive each other.

Foreign and American Slums as Portrayed in "Boys N the Hood" and "City of God"

Boys N the Hood is a 1991 American film written and directed by John Singleton. The story focuses on three black male youths that are growing up in south-central Los Angeles. The three take separate paths as they grow, but are caught up in criminal activities within their neighborhood just the same. For comparison, City of God is a Portuguese film, released in 2002, and directed by Fernando Meirelles and Katia Lund. This film is adapted from a book published in 1997 that tells of the true to life events that took place on the streets of the City of God. Gang rivalries dominate the local culture, and constant wars make life rough and unpredictable. In my argument, I sustain that the representation of black males as disadvantaged Americans experiencing a unique set of cultural circumstances in Boyz N the Hood is refuted by the similar representation of black males living in Latin America in City of God.

The protagonist of each story, Tre in Boyz and Rocket in City, are very similar in a number of ways. Neither boys are well clothed in their youth. “Men use clothing to define and represent distinctive identities based on lifestyle.”(DiMaggio, 1) This is an important technique because it contributes to the understanding that their characters are still undeveloped. As the boys age, we see them wearing proper outfits. The clothing even becomes trendy. We see Tre wearing a quality name brand outfit at the barbeque and Rocket at Benny’s goodbye party. To these characters, brand names are a sign of social standing. Although the outfits they are wearing are not the clothing of men, such as suits or dress clothes, they are far nicer than the clothing of their youth. The clothing symbolizes that the men are coming along in their growth but have not achieved full development.

Both Tre and Rocket also struggle with achieving sexual maturity. This is another sign that they are not fully developed as men both physically and characteristically. This crucial point helps the characters maintain their supposed innocence and sets them apart from the other men in the slums. The other men are sexually mature and consistently exhibit violent behavior. The protagonists do not engage in deliberate violence or express true anger until just before they achieve sexual maturity. Rocket explodes in anger at the newspaper lady in an unforeseen manner just prior to his first sexual experience and Tre has an angry outburst that is uncharacteristic until he encounters his first sexual experience.

The innocence of Tre and Rocket in their youth plays a role in a scene that is shared by both films depicting a ball being taken by older teenagers. In Boyz, a football is stolen in an act that violates the trust of the boys. As the scene comes to an end, Tre and his friends are leaving believing the ball is long lost, only to have it returned by a thug with a heart. Likewise, in City, a soccer ball is destroyed by the older boys. The ball is ruined by violence in the form of gunfire, but the same boys who damage the ball pay ten times over for its replacement. Both scenes are foreshadowing the future violence in the boy’s life and challenge the viewer to see both the violent nature and humanity of the older boys. Ironically, the older boys are drawn into the playful interactions of the innocent boys, but subsequently ruin that innocence through their violent behavior, and then long to make the wrong into right.

There are many similarities between other roles as well. “Ricky is the more "positive" of the brothers” in Boyz, as is Benny in City (Seelow, 1). Both are men who misbehave in some way. Ricky has a child at a young age, while Benny assists Ze in creating his empire. Despite these facts, they are largely seen as good innocent men who are going to successfully escape the slums. Both men are seen in very different attire than their counterparts. This acts as a strong visual separation for the audience. Ricky is seen in football jerseys and ultimately in a white button-down shirt in his death scene. The white shirt drenched in blood is an obvious symbol of innocence. Benny is seen in trendy clothing that is very different than the men in his gang. Ricky is killed on the day he would have found out that he was getting out of the hood, while Benny was killed on the night before he was supposed to be leaving the slum for the farm life. Both incidents illustrate the difficulty in escaping the slums. The deaths of both characters also share similar causes. Both men die as a result of their tangled interactions with their negative foils, Lil Ze and Doughboy. Ricky begins the sequence of events inevitably leading to his murder by causing a scene over a minor infraction. This infraction is instigated by Doughboy’s desire for intimidation and control as he shows his gun to a rival posse. Benny chose to align with Lil Ze and is ultimately killed as a result of Lil Ze’s behavior against other inhabitants of the slum.

We see a connection between Doughboy and Lil Ze. Both start out as children who commit a crime and desire control over their environment in later life. This can be seen in Doughboy’s constant watch from his front porch and in Ze’s murderous behavior in his slum. The controlling and arrogant nature of both boys ultimately leads to the death of their “pure” counterparts.
Both films tell the story of the main characters over many years. This time span allows the viewers to recognize the innocence of the older more violent gangsters. Without seeing the characters as youth experiencing a dark world, the viewer would not be able to identify and feel remorse for the older characters.

There is also a shared increase in the complexity of the environments the characters live in between the two films. In the beginning of Boyz, we see a neighborhood that is limited to small street scenes. As the movie progresses, we see trips into other neighborhoods such as when Furious Styles takes the boys to see the billboard. Likewise, at the beginning of City, the slum is seen as simple rows of simple houses, but as the film continues we find ourselves deeper and deeper into a maze of allyways, apartment complexes, and staircases. In the final battle in City, there are complex scenes of passageways and buildings, symbolizing how the violence reaches into every corner, drawing boys from every place.

When the boys are young, there is little mention of commercialism. The characters are poorly clothed and entertain themselves with simple sports. Their earnings are meager and earned through simple employment such as selling fish and doing chores. As the boys age, we immediately see the introduction of popular music in both films, clothing becomes brand-name, jobs become entry-level professional, and entertainment is found in night clubs and car shows. “As a street kid, Rocket takes up photojournalism as a way to bust out and to understand his life.” (Travers, 1) The introduction of global ideas and products occurs at the same time as the shift to violence is seen in the young men. It is very clear that as materialism increases, violence also increases. In the climactic scenes of the films, Ricky makes a purchase just before his death, while Benny is killed just after he tries to pass on an expensive camera to Rocket. Lil Ze is killed as a result of chasing a chicken, a commodity in the culture, and the gangsters who kill Ricky in Boyz are killed just while eating at a fast-food joint. Both movies show places of commerce as targets of violent behavior.

In Boys n the hood, the boys may take alternate paths to maturity, but are ultimately stalled by the inexorable draw of their hood and the associated criminal activity. City of God also emphasizes the inescapable nature of events that take place in the slums. From the comparison of these two films, it is clearly evident that the notion of the typical American “hood” in which blacks males are thought to have a serious disadvantage in leading quality lives is not actually constrained just to American cities.

Bibliography:

DiMaggio, Paul. "Fashion and Its Social Agendas: Class, Gender, and Identity in Clothing.” Contemporary Sociology 31.3 (2002): 303-304. Research Library. ProQuest. Georgia Tech Library. 8 Mar. 2009

Seelow, David. "Look Forward in Anger: Young, Black Males and the New Cinema.” Journal of Men's Studies 5.2 (1996): 153. Research Library. ProQuest. Georgia Tech Library. 8 Mar. 2009

Peter Travers. "City of God.” Rolling Stone 24 Jun 2004: 188. Research Library. ProQuest. Georgia Tech Library. 8 Mar. 2009

Surrealism in Films

French film Amélie and American film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind both demonstrate how an unlikely blend of multiple genres can meld together into one seamless film. While these two films are not completely similar in genre, they both put their twists on the conventional melodramatic romantic comedies of Hollywood. The fantastical world of the cheerful Amélie Poulain starkly contrasts with the dark and often cynical feel of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind; yet, both of these films successfully incorporate a surrealist motif in two completely different ways. The remainder of this essay will focus on how this is accomplished.

Merriam-Webster dictionary defines surrealism as “the principles, ideals, or practice of producing fantastic or incongruous imagery or effects in art, literature, film, or theater by means of unnatural or irrational juxtapositions and combinations.” From the start, Amélie undoubtedly falls into this category of surrealism. This is due almost entirely to the unique filming techniques and editing employed in this film. The starting credits alone portray uncharacteristic surreal qualities of not seen in the average romantic comedy. Gold and red tones highlight the young girl Amélie as she performs odd yet ordinary actions such as eating raspberries off her fingers and peeling glue off her finger. However, these normal actions look almost unnatural and have that surreal quality as a result of the unusual cinematography. The camera goes in and out of focus occasionally, blurring the actions and at times the actions are sped up. The scenes are extremely saturated with an emphasis on the red tones and the low key lighting contributes greatly to the unreal feel of the scenery. By the end of the credits, director Jean-Pierre Jeunet had already successfully created an extraordinary, surreal world for the viewer out of everyday objects through his unique cinematography.

Unlike Amélie, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind does not employ any elaborate filming techniques to create the surrealistic feel of the film. Instead, the viewer is eased into the film’s surreal world. In the first scene we are introduced to Joel, a shy, self-conscious man who can find no meaning in life and Clementine who has a personality as vibrant and unusual as her blue hair. Throughout the course of the movie we gain a deeper understanding of their relationship through various flashbacks. One of the most surreal aspects of this film is the storyline. Amélie dealt with everyday happenings. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind on the other hand involves the idea that certain memories can be erased through a procedure. As Joel is undergoing this procedure, he experiences flashbacks. But, instead of these memories simply replaying in his mind, his past self is cognizant of the people performing the memory erasing. He hears their voices echoing in the background and at times his memories start to combine into one. This void of any feeling of time or space contributes greatly to the surreal motif. In one scene, he is remembering one of his lunches with Clementine but suddenly begins to hear the voices of the present. His past self questions these voices and he wanders into another memory. He walks up to a man and to determine his identity, he turns that man to face him. But because he has no recollection of the man, he is faceless. This scene is one of the first predominately surreal scenes in the film.

Despite their differences in cinematography that contribute to the surrealism, both of these films have certain common aspects contributing to the surreal motifs. One of these similarities is the symbolism throughout the films. The symbols are not understated, but rather blatantly displayed. In Amélie, when her Nino (the man she’s in love with) leaves the café, she literally melts into a puddle of tears. Scenes showing her love-struck visually show a heart throbbing on her chest. Later, when Amélie comes to the aid of a blind man, he ‘sees the light’. In Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, there is a scene showing Joel and Clementine laying face up on ice symbolizing how they would both “like to freeze the moment” (Elvis 1). A birds-eye view of the scene shows an enormous crack spread through the surface symbolizing how Clem is breaking through the tough exterior Joel creates.

Another similarity in the two films is the nonlinear storyline. As explained earlier, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind goes through series of flashbacks that often cross each other. Ebert describes the film as “[moving] freely, dizzyingly, forward and backward in time… During the course of the film… they will each experience fragmentary versions of relationships they had, might have had, or might be having.” (Egbert 1) Amélie also follows a nonlinear storyline because of the many side stories that are revisited throughout the film. The nonlinear storylines help to create a sense of unknowing what will come next.

The last similarity between the two films is the characterization of Amélie and Clementine. Both of these female characters contribute greatly to the surrealistic feel because of their odd personalities. Elvis describes Clementine as having a “neurotic assertiveness that makes someone like Clem seem less attractive every time she opens her mouth, yet she also projects the charm of someone who needs to be heard.” (Elvis 1) Amélie is equally as charming and odd as Clementine. And it is because of these odd personalities that the surreal world the viewer encounters throughout the movies seems less unreal. The characterization blends perfectly in each of these movies and contributes to the surreal feel on a whole.

Amélie and Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind both demonstrate a wide range of techniques used in filming to create the feel of a surrealistic world. Amelie’s director Jean-Pierre Jeunet played more with unusual cinematography techniques such as saturated colors, odd frames, varied lighting and diverse camera movements. On the other hand, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind twisted the content of the movie to create the same surreal effect Amélie had on the viewer. However, both made use of a nonlinear storyline and bizarre characters to solidify the surreal motifs in the movies. Regardless of the methods used, both of these movies succeed at creating an extraordinary world for the viewer that seems completely natural.

Globalized Dualism and its Effect on Mankind

Globalized Dualism and its Effect on Mankind
Stories are built upon the basis of conflict and resolution; when something is not right, it must be fixed. Thus the basis for modern storytelling and film is born. A story has no motion without conflict, which gives it the dynamics to make it pull at the emotions of its audience. Like the push and pull of the tides, a story progresses through the crests and troughs of the plot line until finally it climaxes, which is then generally followed by some sort of falling action. This entire act is made more drastic and given greater emphasis when considered with the idea of binary oppositions, or dualism. Seeing things in pairs of opposites can give the illusion of greater conflict with stark contrasts, leading to moments of dissonance within the plot line followed amelioration. The films No Man’s Land and Turtles Can Fly show these ideologies of binary oppositions within their own context, using similar themes to portray different storylines.
From the onset of the film No Man’s Land, the contrasts are thrust upon the viewer. In the middle of war, the two sides are watching over the small area that separates them, adding a physical element and explicit meaning to the underlying ideological divide. The two sides each think that they themselves are in the right and the other is completely and totally wrong, as is usually the case in almost any war. A viewer can take much more from this film than just those ideas drawn from the placing of the two sides. When the soldiers find themselves together in the trench, they at one point erupt into argument over which side started the war. This argument resurfaces multiple times, and each time the victor is the party who happens to be holding a gun at that moment.
Amy Corbin makes a very insightful point in her article saying, “When Ciki finds a gun and shoots Nino, Nino falls to the ground, filmed from a high-angle shot suggestive of Ciki’s point of view. (Tanovic often films from various subjective angles to underscore his point that wars always have multiple points of view, especially one with so many nations involved)” (Corbin 47). This is opposing to the general context of dualism, due to the fact that it bridges the gap between the two, showing that they are not so different from each other after all. With this the conflict shifts from primarily being between Nino and Ciki, the two soldiers from opposing sides, to being between them and everything that is outside of the trench. Their teamwork temporarily blurs the lines that divided them due to the innate need for survival. Bringing them closer together and thus bringing out one of the implicit meanings of the film in the universality of human-kind. This bond is formed over the course of the film, but it takes very little for it to digress back into the bitter animosity it once was. Thus, showing a feeling of reversion back to chaos, which through the eyes of the main U.N. soldier, shows a global attitude of hopelessness, both through his eyes and through those of the feuding sides.
Dualism plays a more subtle role in Turtles Can Fly, where the young and impoverished child followers of Satellite are seen as the opposite of the Americans who live in luxury with everything they could ever want. Satellite’s followers have almost a Marxist way about them. Since there really is no upper class other than Satellite himself, arguably, they take to a more communist approach to society, doing the tasks they are asked for the greater good of the group. Satellite takes the role of the bargaining capitalist, trying to get what he can for and/or from everyone. His counter-image, Henkov, an aloof boy with no arms who can predict the future creates an interesting conflict with Satellite in this film.
Set in the war-torn slums of Iran, the setting is one that shows of a history of war and hardship, with the children showing the brunt of the pain through their crippled and emaciated states. Yet, the viewer is not shown any fighting to speak of. Save a few instances, there is no actual hardship shown in relation to the war, with the exception of the obvious poverty of the area. Instead, the primary conflict lies within Satellite’s journey of taking care of the local children, his pursuit of Agrin, and his rivalry with Henkov. These ideas create a much more universal approach to the film, seeming to make the children in their horrific state seem normal, and share similar problems to children in other areas at times. This works in contrast with the ideas of dualism and how things must work in opposites. Yet the film does show instances of the divide between U.S. culture and Iranian culture through the human interactions, or lack thereof, between the two. The American troops are portrayed to be cold and distant, even though they bring humanitarian relief to the village. This shows a global perspective to the film, but a lack of globalization due to the perspective.
Returning to No Man’s Land, we see a similarity between the two films in perspectives on globalization. Within each film lies the awkward situation in which the outsider, the U.N. in the case of No Man’s Land and the U.S. in the case of Turtles Can Fly, comes in to better the situation, when in reality they paint a sour image of self-interest taking priority to helping those really in need. The scene of No Man’s Land where the soldier is left laying on the mine to die shows a dualism between reality and what we are shown. The reporters believe, or at least are told to make their viewers believe, that the soldier has been rescued, when in reality his life is determined less valuable than a slight smudge on the reputation of the U.N. This makes it seem as if globalization could be seen as a negative idea, and that the two sides should be left to settle their disputes on their own.
At the same time, it tugs on the emotions of the viewer, making them want the U.N. to do more even though in reality the soldier’s fate was sealed from early on in the film. It portrays this idea though its use of viewpoints. There is not one national point of view in this film (Corbin 46). The viewer has an omniscient viewpoint, knowing everything that is happening. This contributes to a global viewpoint by not weighting the film down with one cultural identity.
Personalities can be easily seen as opposites in Turtles Can Fly; Satellite always keep a positive attitude about himself, while Agrin battles deep seeded depression due to her past. This is seen throughout the film with her quiet and dark attitude, her lack of caring for her younger “brother,” who in reality turns out to be her son. Her struggle of how to deal with her son shows a position away from globalized ideals of a mother’s love. She does not want the child and tries several times to pawn off her responsibilities with him (Lane 93). As already mentioned, Satellite’s businessman mentality and extroversion give the viewer an impression of him as the leader who takes very little time to think introspectively. He works on how he feels at the moment rather than brooding over situations like Agrin does.
Binary oppositions present themselves throughout both films and are an essential tool in developing the conflict in both stories. Where there is not uniformity, there is the potential for conflict and thus tension is created. Where there is tension there is the potential for the conflict on which stories are developed, and films such as these provide an excellent medium for this. Each film uses dualism to portray its conflicts. Even though they may be different in content with regards to how these oppositions shape the story, the underlying ideas behind them are similar.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Globalization: Delivering a Labyrinth of Ideologies

New ways of thought have historically swept across continents, sparking revolutions and changes in lifestyle. Social movements can have impacts reaching past the borders of just one country. The widespread nature of some ideas is due to the impact of globalization, while in other places it is due to independent developments within a region. As a part of their impact on culture and society, such ideas also have an indelible impact on films. While each has a distinct style and is impacted by different local influences and histories, Italy’s Il Postino and Spain’s Pan’s Labyrinth each show signs of similar ideologies and universal themes that are the product of both globalization and independent local development of ideas.

Pan’s Labyrinth, set in Spain in 1944 during post-civil war unrest, is the tale of Ofelia, a girl who is confronted by fantastic creatures that send her on a quest to prove herself to be the exiled princess of their underworld realm. Her fairytale adventures, though often perilous, are starkly contrasted by the real-world conflicts, as her misogynistic stepfather, a violent and self-righteous general Vidal, is battling against the Spanish guerrilla resistance in the mountains.

Il Postino, on the other hand, is set in Italy in the 1950’s and follows Mario Ruoppolo, a man whose sole job is to deliver mail to the venerable Pablo Neruda, an exiled Chilean poet. While Mario is initially interested in following Neruda’s footsteps to use poetry to win over his love, he is also influenced by Neruda’s Marxist leanings. After Neruda returns to his home in Chile, Mario is invited to read one of his own poems dedicated to Neruda at a communist rally. As Neruda learns upon returning to the Italian island for a visit, Mario is killed in a subsequent riot days before his first son is born.

While each film has circumstances that are unique to its respective setting, both films are clearly influenced by global ideologies. Marxism, which is largely influenced by the idea of a classless society for the benefit of the community, is a key ideology in Il Postino. Modern communism began developing in the late nineteenth century and spread like wildfire throughout the world. The concept of it reaching an isolated Italian island is clearly a sign of globalization, which is the passing of ideas and goods across the world with increasing speed and efficiency, within the scope of the film. Fascism is another ideology that became widespread in many countries throughout the twentieth century. The regime that was in control of Spain following the Spanish Civil War was largely fascist. Ofelia’s stepfather, Captain Vidal, is a general of this regime. The spread of fascist principles, which involve strictly-enforced nationalism and self-righteous pride in one’s country, marked the history of many countries following World War I. Although each specific instance of fascism focuses the attention on a national level, fascism has been seen in a plethora of countries; its incorporation into Pan’s Labyrinth is a sure sign of globalization.

In addition to Marxism, feminism is a movement that is sweeping the globe. More feminist-conscious films portray women not as weak and submissive objects of desire, but as people with their own strengths, weaknesses, and trials. In Il Postino, women are, at first glance, treated only in the context of their appeal to men. Mario himself is only preoccupied with learning the art of poetry in order to woo Beatrice, a beautiful woman in the village. The way women are shown to flock almost mindlessly toward Pablo Neruda, on the premise that they are solely interested in his love poetry and not at all in his more intellectual ideas, also adds to this unfair portrayal of women. On a deeper level, however, Il Postino is on par with other feminist films of the present day. The film’s two most prominent female characters, Beatrice and her aunt, are clearly independent women. As seen in the image, the aunt successfully runs her own café without the help of any man. When Beatrice first meets Mario and beats him in foosball, she conquers the stereotype of a submissive female. While the idea of women being subordinate to men may be a dominant cultural thought, the real women of the film are smart and self-sufficient.

In Pan’s Labyrinth, the women are also stuck in a society that places them in subordinate roles. Ofelia’s mother, Carmen, “has become nothing but a show piece and vessel for Vidal's unborn baby” (Zipes 2). This is particularly manifested when she is made to sit in a wheelchair while she is pregnant, a symbolic gesture showing that the society places women in subordinate conditions. Mercedes, another prominent female character, is stuck in the role of a servant to the general. Finally, Ofelia herself, the main character, is expected to simply sit quietly and look nice. While their society may treat them as inferiors, the film brings out the strength in each of the women, focusing on their courage. The film focuses on the mother’s conscious decision to marry the general, which she does purely because she thinks he will provide for the survival of her family. While she may have less power in the social constructs of the time, she shows her courage and strength through her plight as she chooses to make sacrifices for her family to be safe and well. Mercedes also breaks her stereotypical submissive servant role; “Mercedes, dismissed as ‘just a woman,’ is in league with the guerrillas and will conspire against her tyrannical master under his very nose” (Smith 3). Her courageous actions show that she is not a mere object of the general’s possession; she is her own person and has the power to undermine his authority. Ofelia also goes against societal constructs concerning the expectation that she be seen and not heard. One particular scene, which can be seen in the shot, in which she does this is when she dirties her beautiful new dress while on one of her many quests. The film also gives her power in that she is a princess, which is traditionally a position of power. The portrayal of women in both Il Postino and Pan’s Labyrinth as independent, strong characters marks these films as influenced by feminist ideology, which could be considered either a product of globalization, as the feminist movement has been a global trend, or locally-developed feminism.

Another ideological trend that pervades each film is that of Christianity. First of all, the main character of each film can be viewed as a Christ figure. In Il Postino, Mario takes on communist ideals that are portrayed to be to the benefit of the entire community, and, like Christ, Mario is sacrificed for trying to bring good to the people. Ofelia, on the other hand, refuses to complete her final task, which would entail handing her newborn brother over so his blood could be used to open the portal to the underworld; she proves she is truly the underworld princess, is subsequently shot by her stepfather, and joins her true family in the underworld. She shows such a strong belief in protecting her sinless infant brother that she is similarly martyred to save him and born again, as Christ was. Both characters die for their cause in an attempt to benefit others, marking them as Christ figures. Christianity is also present in Il Postino as the film follows a celebration honoring Mary, which involves setting a likeness of Mary, surrounded by candles, out to sea in a raft. Another biblical reference in Pan’s Labyrinth can be found when Ofelia succumbs to the temptation to eat a grape in the dungeon of the Pale Man. Ofelia has been warned by the faun that the feast in the dungeon is forbidden fruit and eats it anyway, bringing death and destruction in the wake of her action. The image to the left shows Ofelia as she is about to eat the grape, ignoring the fairies warning her not to.This scene is reminiscent of Adam and Eve eating of the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden, which results in a loss of innocence. In Pan’s Labyrinth, the faun turns away from Ofelia and tells her that she is no longer welcome in the underworld because of her mistake. In a similar way, God expels Adam and Eve from paradise for their actions. In another scene, Ofelia is being pursued through the labyrinth by her violent stepfather. When she appears to be cornered, the walls of the labyrinth simply open up to make a pathway for Ofelia, leaving the general behind. This scene is reminiscent of the story of the parting of the Red Sea in the Bible, as both the Jewish people and Ofelia are running for their lives and a path appears for them out of nowhere, apparently as a result of some divine power. Because Christianity is a widespread ideology and both films have strong Christian influences, the films show evidence of globalization simply by having Christian themes.

Different ideas often spread quickly throughout the globe, as evidenced by the spread of Christianity, Marxism, and feminism. Some ideas, however, seem to be ingrained in the human psyche. The ideas come in the form of universal themes, timeless messages about life and humanity that can be found throughout literature, the arts, and, in present times, movies. Both films, for example, make use of the tendency of humans to associate the great heights of mountains with enlightenment and clarity of thought. In Il Postino, for example, Pablo Neruda’s house (seen in the image) is located on a mountain; “Mario must bicycle to see Neruda at the remote hilltop outpost,” working hard in order to earn Neruda’s enlightening thoughts on poetry and the meaning of life (Maslin 1).In Pan’s Labyrinth, the rebels, portrayed as valiant heroes, are in hiding on top of the mountains, shown in the image, while the general’s forces are relatively low geographically; the rebels’ values are set to a high standard, while the general is portrayed as unenlightened and relatively savage. The idea that the mountains are a place of enlightenment is common throughout many cultures and is evidence of common themes in both films.

The two films are marked by very different features. One has a fast-paced plot, the other a slow-paced plot. One is full of fairy tale creatures, the other is highly realistic. One has shorter takes with a lot of panning of the camera, while the other has longer takes. However, both films show the presence of widespread ideologies, displaying the universalism of human ideas and the globalization that has influenced them both.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Once Were Warriors

Made in 1994, Once Were Warriors is a film that takes place in New Zealand and focuses in on the life of poverty and loss of traditional culture of the native Maori people. Beth Heke, the wife of an angry alcoholic and mother of five children, deals with hardships as her husband abuses her, one of her sons is sent to a correctional school, and one of her daughters writes fairy tales as a means of escape from the moral degradation all around her. Throughout the film, the children gain a better appreciation for their Maori heritage, learning self-discipline and what it means to look out for one another.

Conflicts between local and global ideas play a particularly important role in this film; the characters and the culture around them are caught in a battle between local traditional culture and more global culture. Global culture is portrayed negatively in this film, as more global-influenced rock music and westernized bars are associated with the macho, alcoholic culture that the father is immersed in and that brings down the family. Scenes of poverty and the use of graffiti also add to the negative portrayal of a more urban, globalized culture.

Maori culture, on the other hand, is portrayed positively. When Boogie is taken away from his family to go to a correctional school, where he is taught Maori traditions and dance, traditional culture is shown as being a good influence and having power to conquer poor behavior. The teacher at the school instills in Boogie pride for his heritage. Additionally, the mother’s tale of how she and her husband were married adds to this positive portrayal of Maori culture. The two of them used to live with their tribe, but the elders did not approve of their marriage, so they decided to leave. The fact that abandoning their culture has led them to the squalor that they presently deal with implies that Maori culture is superior.

Mise-en-scene plays a particular role in this dichotomy of a global and local culture clash through setting. The more urbanized, and therefore more globalized setting in the city is related to the global culture. This setting is full of graffiti, dark alleys, and filth. This gives a negative connotation to a life that is more globally influenced. When the family takes a road trip to a country-side setting, they visit the land where the Maori tribe lives and where the parents grew up. This setting, which represents the local culture, is a beautiful land of green grass, gentle hills, and pristine lakes, all bathed in golden sunlight. This setting represents the purity and bright joy to be had in returning to Maori life and starkly contrasts the darkness to be found in the city away from the Maori lifestyle.

Once Were Warriors shows both global and local influences and even goes as far to present a battle between the two. The film glorifies Maori traditions, while it treats a more globalized way of life disapprovingly for its role in marginalizing local culture.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

No Man's Land

No Man’s Land is a foreign drama about the encounter of two soldiers fighting for opposing sides during the Bosnian War. The two men meet in an abandoned trench and while fighting all along, must find a way to convince the UNPROFOR to lead them out of “no man’s land”. There is also a man who is lying on a mine and therefore cannot move. This man spurs the actions of the other two on several occasions.

Over all, this film is a modern look into the personal ideas and thoughts of the individuals who were fighting in the Bosnian War. While trapped between the front lines by their own comrades, the two soldiers share their ideas on why the opposing side is at fault in the war and why it continues to be fought. The fact that they both agree that the war is needless and should stop immediately has no affect on the deep grudge each has for the other. For quite awhile, the two soldiers trust each other enough to shoulder their weapons and work together in a dangerous call for help. Equal concern is shared for the immobilized man though he is clearly a friend of the Bosnian and would rather see the other man dead. The trusting relationship between the trapped soldiers does not last long though and a constant power struggle takes place in which each soldier takes control only for as long as he remains vigilant and watchful. The situation between these two soldiers is analogous to the very war that has led them into it. The ongoing tension as each nation carefully monitors the border binds the warring nations into a perpetual battle at the lines.

While the soldiers wait, the UNPROFOR has internal problems of its own creating a situation in which they claim they can do nothing, but must act when the media intervenes. The colonel responsible for the necessary actions to save the stranded soldiers cares much more about creating a possible conflict within no man’s land than saving the lives of three helpless men. In the end, the two soldiers are retrieved from the trench only to kill one another within minutes. Their story, rather than uniting the opposing sides, can only stimulate more anger and increased tension. The man trapped by the mine cannot be saved, exemplifying the interminability of the terrible conflict surrounding the story.

This film takes a clear view on the senselessness of the Bosnian war. It takes careful aim at the troubled internal workings of the UNPROFOR. The media are shown to be a vital aid in bringing people to realize that the war is needless, and inciting outsiders to intervene. There is a clear global message about the nature of war and fighting: It is an unnecessary, vicious cycle with an outcome that is never enjoyed by either side.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Turtles Can Fly

Turtles Can Fly tells the sad story of Kurdish refugees through the fall of Saddam Hussein and leading up to the American invasion of Iraq. Despite its focus on such a tense political issue, the film makes no attempt to form any solid opinion of either supporting or opposing the war. Instead we are drawn into the precarious lives of children refugees led by a boy they call Satellite as they face the hardships and daily struggles of life.

The cinematography perfectly captures the bleak and dying landscape of a small village located along the Iraqi-Turkish border. This atmosphere, which is maintained throughout the entirety of the film, serves to highlight the similarly tragic lives of the refugees. Left with no place to call their homeland, the Kurdish people lived repressed and hard lives under the regime of Saddam. Yet with the fall of Saddam, they are neither content nor discontented. They seem dispirited - as if nothing could change the hardships they've faced. News of the American invasion does not bring them hope. Even the children have learned that daily they must struggle to survive.

We see all these terrors faced by the refugees through the lives of children. This ironic spin in casting makes this movies unique and flawlessly portrays the struggles of these people. Seeing all of this suffereing through the once innocent eyes of the chilrdren makes the situation even harder to face and at the same time more tangible and real. In the end, we see American soldiers running past Sattelite and his friend, not sparing a glance. But that has been the story of the Kurds: always disregarded and without any land to call their own.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

The Death of Mr. Lazarescu: Somber Sadness

Romania has been known for dark and somber themes in its cinema, and The Death of Mr. Lazarescu is no different. The film centers around the sickly, old Mr. Lazarescu and his trip through the Romanian medical system. This film concentrates more on those around him rather than his own story though. He acts more as a centerpiece, linking different ideas together. By doing this, one is able to see the disorganization of the medical system in Romania, thus showing the economic climate of the region.

The film has some very intriguing elements that do seem to bring out many ideas. First, early on in the film there is a scene where he is waiting in the hall of his building for one of his neighbors to bring him some medicine. The light in this hallway is controlled by a timer, and his neighbor has to turn it back on every minute or so. This happens several times creating an annoyance for the viewer. This use of misc-en-scene gives him or her a small taste of what living in that situation would be like. 

In a parallel to the story that is being told by the movie there has been a fatal bus crash in nearby. Throughout the entire film this is referenced through the doctors and through newscasts on television. This paints a picture of the harsh, depressing reality that is Romania.

The hospitals he visits are each different, with the attitudes of the doctors being the focus of the scenes. Mr. Lazarescu, as a patient is refused treatment early on because he simply has alcohol on his breath. This provincial mindset is definitely intended to be the focal point of the scene. The film is trying to convey the problems with Romanian society and how it fails to keep pace with global attitudes. On the other hand, by making this statement, the film itself does just the opposite and does gain a more global perspective.

-Matt Brundage

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Nationalism in the Joint Security Area

Chan-wook Park’s film Joint Security Area centers around two North Korean and two South Korean soldiers in the demilitarized zone separating the two countries. Through a strange order of events the four create a forbid bond of friendship. A sickening twist threatens to unravel everything in a matter of seconds
It becomes quite clear that nationalism is the driving for the majority of the events in the film. The scene of the stone line along the 38th parallel is shown repetitively in order to stress the division between the two nations, as well as the national pride each soldier has for their given country. Just imagine looking at someone day after day but never being able to say a word to them.
The film appears to take several aspects of American film and blend it together with a Korean style. Throughout the film there are numerous action scenes with gunfights and explosions suggesting influence from the States. Park incorporates Korean styles throughout the film as well, simpler plot to how the story was told in a non-linear fashion. Globalization of the Korean society can also be seen within the film when the South Korean soldiers talk about delicious desserts and fancy gadgets they have been imported from America.
The use of color stood out the most to me while viewing this film. Initialing each side, the North and the South, was dressed in drastically different colors, yet as the film progresses this idea changes until reaching the climax of the plot.
Joint Security Area blends an emotional story of four soldiers with action and gun explosions in order to create a high quality Korean movie, while stressing the idea that the two sides must come together and find some form of peace.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Nine Queens: Corruption in Argentinean Society

Set in Buenos Aires, Argentina, “Nine Queens” is the tale of Juan, the good-hearted protagonist who joins forces with Marcos, a purportedly more experienced conman who steals shamelessly and swindles even those scammers who work alongside him. The team undergoes a series of ordeals, only to lose hundreds of thousands of pesos to a worthless check after selling valuable stamps to a powerful man with money to spare. In the end, however, it is revealed that the real trick is on Marcos, as, with Juan’s help, all the people he has betrayed in the past and throughout the course of the movie turn out to be working against Marcos in a seamless and successful plan to take the spoils for themselves. This film has a particularly national stamp in that the plot and the way in which Marcos’s and Juan’s characters contrast each other highlights the underlying element of a lack of trust; this lack of trust, in turn, reflects an Argentinean society with a hidden corruption. Elements such as contrasting characterization and economic troubles convey this sense of insecurity.

In a crucial scene of the film, Marcos attempts to cash a check for a large windfall only to find that there is a run on the bank. Such a display of chaos is unfamiliar to an American audience and would be unrealistic in a Hollywood film set in America, a country that has not experienced such a sign of instability in many decades. However, the scene is reasonable enough to make the movie still appear realistic, which is a sign that marks the film as Argentina’s own. Such instability is portrayed as being relatively normal there, which shows a film audience and larger society in the nation that is used to a lack of trust in the financial system.

The lack of trust is also shown in the juxtaposition of the characters of Marcos and Juan. Marcos’s shameless conning shows that he represents the corruption that some people perceive to be running rampant in Argentinean society. Juan’s reluctance to steal from the misfortunate shows that he represents the caring common man. When they first meet and Marcos offers Juan a partnership for the day, the view rotates around them, showing close-ups of both faces. The way in which the view is framed is reminiscent of scenes in which two enemies meet and prepare for battle. This use of the framing alerts viewers that the two will be pitted against each other despite their apparent unity, just as the common man is pitted against the corrupted in an apparently united country. Throughout the film, Juan periodically questions Marcos’s intentions and acts worried that Marcos will trick him and take all the money for himself. This represents the common man’s lack of trust in society as corruption looms. The two also represent a clash between tradition and modern decline. Juan is portrayed as a family man concerned for his father, while Marcos represents the erosion of family values, as he has stolen inheritance money from his siblings.

The Argentinean social trend of a lack of trust in society is evident through the scam genre of the film itself, the characterization, and the economic background of the country. A general unease is portrayed as being commonplace in the country. The movie ends on a positive note, however, as the victims take matters into their own hands and deal justice to the corrupt. It remains to be seen, however, whether this is just an appeal to the audience, satisfying their wish for power to be given to the common man, or if it is reasonable to expect justice to be brought to the corrupt society.